Elevator power usage – should I take the stairs?
I’ve always wondered how much power elevators use and how efficient they are. This seemed like a perfect job for the new TED Pro 3-phase power monitor.
I hooked up the monitor and then sent the elevator up and down a couple of times empty and with two different weight loads…
Big bars are the elevator going up, short ones are the elevator going back down.
- The elevator controller uses about 83 watts all the time, even when the elevator is idle. That’s about $130 per year without even moving!
- Going up uses almost 40 times as much power as going down.
- Going up 5 floors uses about 500 kilowatt seconds and costs about $0.03.
- It does not seem to consistently take more power to lift a full elevator than an empty one.
- It takes more power to lift an elevator that has been sitting idle for a while than one that is “warm”.
- My guess is that there is more friction on a “cold” elevator because each use lubricates the piston. This would also explain the energy spike at the very beginning of the first two lifts as the the elevator breaks the initial static holding friction.
- Going up with a load takes a few seconds longer than going up empty.
- This is a hydraulic lift elevator. The total travel is 5 floors/55 feet. I weigh about 170lbs.
- I used my local ConEd electric rates of $0.18/KWh ($0.10/KWh for power, $0.08/KWh for delivery).
- The elevator slows down as it gets close to the target landing so that it doesn’t overshoot. This is the reason for the “shelf” at the end of each lift bar.
- To go up, you pump high pressure hydraulic fluid into the piston. To go down, you open a valve and let the pressure out.
So, should you take the stairs?
Stairs: 92KWs / (22 calories)
Magic: 12KWs (the theoretical minimum possible)
If the elevator is going up anyway, then you should hop on since your additional weight has almost no effect on the total power used.
If you are considering taking the elevator alone, you should take the stairs.
Your physics is wrong. kW is power unit, kWh is energy unit. Are you measuring power or energy? If you are measuring power, the area you show is the energy. Calorie is energy unit, it cannot be equal to any kW. this is really confusing article
Hey dumbass, he uses “kWs” not “kWh” or “kW”. Maybe this is too advance for you but “kWs” stand for “kilowatt-second”
Besides the “dumbass” (no need to be impolite), I would argue that you are wrong: kWs stands for “kilowatt-second” (that is correct), but if energy is measured in a [unit of power] times a [unit of time], kWs is *still* a unit of energy.
I think I’ve got my units right (I am a units freak!). Maybe the confusion is that I am measuring energy in killo-watt-seconds rather than kWh? 1 kWh=3600kWs. Am I missing something?
You are all right and … right too: KWs is unusual.
Yeah I’ve never heard kWs before, but it’s a simple conversion. 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, so 3,600 seconds in an hour.
Therefore there are 3,600 kWs in 1 kWh.
So 550 kWs = 550/3600 kWh = ~0.15 kWh, which at a cost of $0.18 per kWh = ~2.75 cents.
This is pretty interesting. Just thought I’d look this up after staring at those lights above the elevator door (the ones that tell you what floor it’s on). Someone should invent some sort of machine that converts the kinetic energy of the elevator going down, back into electricity.
Neat, and answered exactly what I was curious to know!
Really surprised about the 83W idle consumption. That’s a lot of power – easily enough that the controller would need to be fan cooled. Is there any possibility that the lighting inside the elevator was on the circuit which was measured? Two 32W T8 fluorescent bulbs + a 20W-ish controller would add up.
Lighting was on a different circuit, so that draw was all controller. It generates a lot of heat.